Timeline of the Corporatization of the United States 1871
The information in this post is sourced from a combination of my research, the research of those before me (already published), Congressional documents, Supreme Court documents, government documents, and more, plus all of their archives. Sources quoted will be hyperlinked and directly available under the information given AND cited as references at the bottom of this article for self-verification. As a disclaimer, I am merely providing factual evidence to paint a picture of the political and economic state of America and the world over the last four centuries and it is the responsibility of the reader, and with full liability, to discern its truth and merit.
This article is for perspective of the whole picture, knowing that the enemy ALWAYS controls both sides of any and all conflicts, and creates, uses, and contrives these real problems, using our morals and humanity against us, to divide the people for the sake of wealth transfer, land grabs, economical manipulation, and thus their ultimate power and control.
Recognizing that we live, politically and economically, under the Corporation of America is a big step in being able to overcome it, and I will show you we indeed do, but in order to truly and fully understand what we are dealing with we need to understand WHY it was allowed to happen and HOW it happened.
To understand that much we need to know the players and the timeline that led up to it going all the way back to pre American Revolutionary War time to the expansionist colonization of Europe and the world by dominant European nations and very wealthy merchants/bankers.
All expansionist colonization and the subsequent wars in history were fought out of greed and lust for world pre-eminence; global dominance in money/land, power, and control of religion. In the 1500’s-1700’s many of the wealthy merchants and powerful nations of Europe decided to expand their business and territories in seek of more wealth and power; namely Britain, Spain, France, Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden. A century later Italy and Germany would also get involved. The elite merchants in various industries, funded by merchant banks and wealthy private investors, would colonize new land in Europe, North America, Caribbean, South America, West Africa, India, and the Philippines.
Ecclesiastes 1:9- That which has been is that which will be, And that which has been done is that which will be done. (So there is nothing new under the sun).
PLAYBOOK KNOWN
Oct 3, 1213: where King John surrendered his kingdoms to the Pope, and as the’ Vicar of Christ’ the Pope claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as was his belief. Britain is owned by the Vatican. Therefore, the Vatican owned all of Britain’s territories/land/colonies in perpetuity.
(Treaty of 1213) and this linkThere was an explosion of joint stock (incorporated) companies. Some of the biggest influencers and a few notable ones to remember for later were: English East India Company (1600), Dutch East India Company (Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie, 1602), Virginia Company (1606), Plymouth (1606), Newfoundland Company (1610), Somers Island (Bermuda) Company (1615), Guinea Company (1618), Dutch West India Company (West-Indische Compagnie, 1621), Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), Providence Island Company (1630) in the West Indies, Royal African Company (1672) in West Africa.
1603 Queen Elizabeth I dies and King James I (Protestant) is now the monarch. His wife Anne is from Denmark and they have a son Charles I (who would marry a Catholic).
1605 Gunpowder plot fails to kill King James I
1606, King James (yes, the King James who revised the bible) signed the charter of Virginia. The charter granted Americas British forefathers a license to settle and colonize America. The charter also guaranteed future kings and queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.
1607 First English colony in America - Jamestown
1611 King James version of the Bible completed
1625 King James Dies, son Charles I (half Danish) becomes King
Charles I (Catholic wife and thought to be secret Catholic) dukes it out with Parliament (Pro-Protestant) which sought to curb monarch power.
1639-1651 Civil Wars - England, Scotland, Ireland over Catholicism vs Protestantism and Monarch Rule vs Parliamentary Rule
The victors beheaded Charles I, vanquished his son, Charles II, to France, and Oliver Cromwell declares himself Lord Protector of an English Republic.
1652 Anglo-Dutch Wars begin
1658 Cromwell dies
1660 Charles II comes back and becomes King; Restoration of the English monarchy.
1662 Goldsmiths start handing out receipts for cash held, starting cheques and banknotes
1664 British troops capture New Amsterdam and renamed New York
1664 Great Plague breaks out in London
1672 Charles II attempted to introduce religious freedom for Catholics and Protestant dissenters with his 1672 Royal Declaration of Indulgence, but the English Parliament forced him to withdraw it.
The Exclusion Crisis ran from 1679 until 1681 in the reign of Charles II. Three Exclusion bills sought to exclude the King's brother and heir presumptive, James, Duke of York, from the throne because he was Roman Catholic.
1683 the Exclusion Crisis saw the birth of the pro-exclusion Whig and anti-exclusion Tory parties. Charles II sided with the Tories, and after the discovery of the Rye House Plot to murder Charles and James in 1683, some Whig leaders were executed or forced into exile.
1685 James II (Catholic) inherits throne after his brother Charles II dies and heavily favors Roman Catholics again
1688 Whig Conspiracy to remove James II and replace with Protestant William III of Orange (Dutch) who married Mary (cousins) (both grandchildren of Charles I)
1688 Glorious Revolution / Protestant Parliament against Catholicism Monarchy. England becomes a Constitutional Monarchy. James II flees to France. During the Glorious Revolution, surviving members of the Oxford Parliament met again in December 1688, following the flight of James II - leading to the election of the irregular Convention Parliament which conferred the Throne jointly on William III of Orange and Mary II.
1688 William III of Orange becomes King surrounded by Dutch merchants, bankers, and investors. England becomes a Constitutional Monarchy.
Further noted: In 1688 England's pro-Catholic Stuart king, James II, was deposed by his Dutch son-in-law, the Protestant William of Orange. James - whose name in Latin was Jacobus, hence the name Jacobites - fled to France. There he continued to be supported by Freemasons in Scotland and Wales who sought to restore him to the English throne. They were accused by French Freemasons of converting Masonic rituals and titles into political support for this restoration. According to some versions of Masonic history, James was ensconced in the Chateau of Saint-Germain by his friend, French King Louis XIV where he established a system of Masonry that became known as the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.
Jacobites were right-winged and argued monarchs were appointed by God, or divine right, and could not be removed. They are associated with early Freemasonry and, in particular, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.
Jacobins were left-winged and argued that the people should be in control, without religious interference, and that the Parliamentary rule was superior to monarch rule. A Jacobin can be described as an ardent or republican supporter of a centralized and revolutionary democracy or state.
1694 Massive debts from all the wars cause the need for the Bank of England. Created by a Scot, William Paterson, for the sole purpose of lending money to King William III of Orange as well as his proposal to finance the future of government debt by private subscription of individual shareholders was innovative in its days. He later said "The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing." (saying the quiet part out loud)
1695, owing to a disagreement with his colleagues, the creator of the Bank of England, William Paterson, withdrew from the board. He would later come up with the idea for the South Seas Company.
1695 The first Governor of the Bank of England was Sir John Doublon, a Dutchman. John Doublon was also Sheriff of the City of London in 1689, an Alderman from 1689 to 1712, Master of the Grocer's Company from 1690 to 1691, Lord Mayor in 1695, Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty from 1694 to 1699. He was again a Bank of England director in 1700, and a director of the New East India Company from 1700 to 1701. His younger brother, Abraham Houblon, was also the Bank of England Governor, from 1703 to 1705. A daughter of Abraham Houblon, Anne, was married to Henry Temple, later Viscount Palmerston, in 1703. His older brother, James, an influential merchant and Member of Parliament for the City of London, was also a director of the Bank of England. Four other of his brothers were prosperous merchants. (what a WEB)
1695 For instance, in 1695, “In the “Lords” (always the more prejudiced and conservative body than the “Commons”), the bill to create the Bank of England met with great opposition. Some noblemen imagined that the Bank was intended to exalt the moneyed interest and debase the landed interest; and others imagined the bill was intended to enrich usurers (who?), who would prefer banking their money to lending it on mortgage. "Something was said," says Macaulay, "about the danger of setting up a gigantic corporation, which might soon give laws to the King and the three estates of the realm."" Later we would find their fears were not unjustified as these mortgages brought all these nations’ political and economical abilities under a degree of control by the bankers as they controlled the supply of money for their endeavors.
With the added interest on some of these historically large loans, the banks profited greatly and they subsequently, and additionally, increased their wealth through their own self interests in specific business/trade. With control over vast swaths of critical merchant industries and banking, they could manipulate the markets, cause recessions, and spark revolutions, which resulted in more war and more debt revenue to the same bankers, and helpless governments (essentially forced) to renew the charters for these banks holding their debts.
1697 The Bank of England secured its position of prominence when parliament forbade the formation of any further joint-stock banks in England in a deliberative effort and anti-competitive practice to form a barrier to market entry for would be competitors like the South Seas Company, which saw the Bank of England as its main competitor for national banking.
Monarchs: “England had a total of five monarchs during the 1700s: William III, Anne, George I, George II and George III. The Act of Settlement, signed in 1701, helped evolve the principle of a constitutional monarchy, still used in England today.
House of Commons: “was the elected part of the British Parliament, albeit that the electorate was made up only of a small number of wealthy men. For much of the 1700s, the Whigs were the dominant party; they supported unpopular foreign-born monarchs and tended to be associated with urban areas and the “new” money made in industry and finance.
1711 The South Sea Company. “The government, in part, perhaps realizing what it had allowed with the Bank of England, had become dissatisfied with the service it was receiving from the foreign interest owned Bank of England, and Edward Harley (a Tory) was actively seeking new ways to improve the national finances.
1720 The Bubble Act, “that incorporated the Royal Exchange and London Assurance Corporation, and which forbade the creation of joint-stock companies without royal charter, was promoted by the South Sea Company itself before its collapse. Thousands of investors were ruined by the share-price collapse, and as a result, the national economy diminished substantially. The founders of the scheme engaged in insider trading, by using their advance knowledge of the timings of national debt consolidations to make large profits from purchasing debt in advance. (sound familiar?)
1756-1763 After the Seven Years War, and the many previous aforementioned wars with France/Spain/etc, and the French and Indian War in North America, Britain’s debt had increased to 122 million pounds by January 1763—an enormous sum for the time. Interest on the debt was more than 4.4 million pounds a year. Figuring out how to pay the interest alone absorbed the attention of the King and his ministers. The King certainly didn’t want to lose out on his taxation revenue from the Colonies (America).
But, On April 19, 1775 the Revolutionary War began as the first shots were fired at Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts. July 4, 1776, after a year of fighting and 13 years of taxation, the Second Continental Congress adopts the signed Declaration of Independence, breaking with Britain.
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the united States of America that served as its first frame of government.
But war was expensive. Very expensive. In order to afford their efforts, from 1775 to 1783, America used a variety of methods to pay for the war. The 13 States printed their own money (39%), Congress printed its own money (28%), The 13 States issued their own debt certificates (14%), Congress issued its own debt certificates (10%), Congress received loans from France, Dutch investors, and the Spanish Crown (6%), and Congress sold bonds to wealthy Americans (3%).
The Crown financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.
After the war, in a “Contract Between the King of France and the thirteen united States of North America”, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782 by Benjamin Franklin and Gravier de Vergennes, in Article I: It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to twenty-one receipts. By which receipts the said Minister has promised, in the name of Congress and in behalf of the thirteen United States, to cause to be paid and reimbursed to the royal treasury of His Majesty, on the 1st of January, 1788, at the house of his Grand Banker at Paris, the said sum of eighteen millions, money of France, with interest at five per cent per annum.
Treaty of Paris 1783 signed by representatives from Britain and Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and John Jay, the representatives of the Thirteen States, Article 4: “It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”
This treaty identifies the King of England as the “prince” of the United States contradicting the belief that America won the war of independence. Although King George III of England gave up most claims over his American colonies, he kept his right to continue receiving payments for his business ventures of colonizing America.
If America won the war of independence, the Revolutionary War, why would we agree to pay reparations to the King? (read that sentence again slowly)
France, having just fought in the French and Indian War during the American Revolution, as well as their war with England, was in historically massive debt. On August 20th, 1786, the new finance minister Charles de Calonne was appointed. He informed King Louis XVI that France faced bankruptcy.
In 1787 a convention of states in Philadelphia proposes the Constitution to replace the “much looser” central government, allowing the states their sovereign freedom, operating under the Articles of Confederation (adopted in 1777). It created a common market, common currency, it regulated trade and commerce, consolidated and funded the national debt, established a national bank, and gave Congress the authority to tax.
September of 1787, even the Paris Parliament rejected Brienne’s ideas of tax reform— this would lead to the start of the financial and industrial crises in France.
1788- On June 7th, ‘Day of the Tiles’ in Grenoble, a city in France. The first revolt against the king due to the economic crises in France. The people were hungry and being instigated by liberal agent provocateurs to rise up against Louis XVI. Mob mentality further provoked by the Jacobins, aka “Society of the Jacobins, Friends of Freedom and Equality”, a far-left, militant, radicalism group that is anti aristocracy, privilege, and anti-religion, begins their insurrection with attacks on royal officers and widespread looting. (sound familiar?)
October 1789- Women’s March On Versailles. (sound familiar?)
1790-Elimination of civil discrimination against jews and suppression of religious orders and vows in order to move towards a secular state. Louis XVI accepts and inaugurated the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, subordinating the Church to the civil government, which was never taken by Pope Pius VI and other numerous individuals of the French clergy. This created a split between those clergy who swore the required pledge and acknowledged the new arrangement between. The resulting years saw violent oppression of the Church, including the imprisonment and killing of priests all through France.
1791- Declaration Of Pillnitz signed by rulers like Roman Emperor Leopold II of Austria and Frederick William II of Prussia on August 27th. This intervention of rulers in French affairs made the statement intending to return freedom and power to the King to strengthen the monarchic government in France. The French people expressed no respect for the dictates of foreign monarchs, and the revolutionary authorities, and the Jacobins declined to accept the demand.
February 1791, the First Bank of the United States (1791-1811) received a unique national charter for twenty years. Alexander Hamilton, Treasurer under George Washington (and huge supporter of the British banking system), helped come up with the idea and convinced Washington to implement a semi-public national bank.
70 percent of the First National Bank was owned by foreigners, and notes that (certain) British bankers were the primary source of capital for the U.S during this era.
November 19, 1794 representatives of the United States and Great Britain signed “John Jay’s Treaty”
1795- people and others, in fear of the Jacobin’s plan rise up against them, ban the Jacobin Club, arrest, try and execute the head of the Jacobin Club and the Leader of the Revolutionary Court. French Army captures Amsterdam (ah… the Dutch Bankers are back in the picture). By the end of 1795 most of King Louis XVI family was executed.
August-October 1798: George Washington, and Rev. G.W. Snyder correspond via letters about the infiltration of the Illuminati and the Jacobins into Freemasonry in America. Please read the correspondence here.
1800- The France national debt, already at perilous levels, had surmounted even further beyond anything fathomable at the time. Some very wealthy bankers were deeply involved in the agitations (Jacobins) leading up to the French Revolution. When the revolutionary violence got out of hand, they were the ones who orchestrated the rise of Napoleon, whom they regarded as the “restorer of order”. As a reward for their support, Napoleon, in 1800, gave the private bankers a monopoly over French finance by giving them control of the new Bank of France. (sound familiar?)
27 Feb. 1801, the “Act concerning the District of Columbia,” later known as the Organic Act, divided the Federal District into Alexandria and Washington counties and set up a court system for both, to which the president appointed officers, including U.S. judges, a marshal and attorney, and justices of the peace.
On 10 Feb. 1803, Virginia congressman Philip R. Thompson introduced another bill for “establishing the Government of the Territory of Columbia.” The legislature included not one but two chambers, a senate and house of representatives, and the position of governor was eliminated, with the executive power instead “vested in the President of the United States.”
In 1804 , while still in office as Vice President, Burr contacted Britain’s Minister to the United States and offered to help Britain take Western territory from the United States, and that he wanted money and ships to carry out his conquest.
1805, Burr, apparently disgruntled by his failures in politics, set west towards the Mississippi with his eye on the Territory of Louisiana, which was largely unsettled, enlisting a number of supporters along the way towards New Orleans, including General James Wilkinson, commander in chief of the US Army, with alleged plans to attack Texas or Mexico in the name of US sovereignty where Burr could declare himself ruler of the conquered lands. Rumors of his plot/scheme spread throughout the US and multiple times he was called by the courts to answer for treason charges — each time acquitted.
December 2, 1806 President Thomas Jefferson, who had learned of Burr’s plans but didn’t believe the Constitution allowed him to use the US Military against citizens, wrote to Congress to take action
January 1807 Jefferson’s opponents, the Federalists, mocked the proclamation and the message to Congress. “Federalists and even some Republicans quietly suggested that “the People ought not to have been alarmed or more [energetic] measures taken.” The media even mocked Jefferson as well.
Federalists insisted, the government had “the power & of course the means [for] preventing any insurrection or enterprize on the public peace or safety”. In fact, Jefferson and most Republicans believed otherwise, rejecting the common-law view that the United States’s mere existence as a country sufficed to make some acts illegal. They argued, instead, that the Constitution granted only limited and specific powers to the federal government. It defined treason, for example, but did not make either conspiring to commit treason or preparing to commit treason a crime.
From Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Paine, 15 January 1805 enclosed a copy of a bill on insurrections in a letter to John Dawson: A Bill authorising the emploiment (sic) of the land or Naval forces of the US. in cases of insurrection.
The insurrection bill became law on March 3, 1807.
In 1808, the Bank’s shareholders asked Congress to extend the charter.
March 1809, Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin recommended renewing the Bank’s charter. Congress let the matter languish until January 1810.
The proposal of the (real) 13th Amendment (1810) by Congress: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of a in any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
Historically, the British peerage system referred to knights as "Squires" and to those who bore the knight's shields as "Esquires". As lances, shields, and physical violence gave way to the more civilized means of theft, the pen grew mightier (and more profitable) than the sword, and the clever wielders of those pens (bankers and lawyers) came to hold titles of nobility. The most common title was "Esquire" (used, even today, by some lawyers).
In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no "title of nobility" or "honor". There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen's "counsel of choice" was not restricted to a lawyer; there were no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London, and closely associated with the international banking system.
Article 1, Sect. 9 of the Constitution sought to prohibit the International Bar Association (or any other agency that granted titles of nobility) from operating in America. But the Constitution neglected to specify a penalty, so the prohibition was ignored, and agents of the monarchy continued to infiltrate and influence the government (as in the Jay Treaty and the US Bank charter incidents). Therefore, a "title of nobility" amendment that specified a penalty (loss of citizenship) was proposed in 1789, and again in 1810.
January 1811 Congress’ decision against renewing the Charter of the First Bank of America. The number of state banks had increased greatly, and those financial institutions feared both competition from a national bank and its power. Many of those who had opposed the bank in 1790-91 still opposed it for the same reasons and said the charter should be allowed to expire. By this point, Alexander Hamilton was dead — killed in a duel with Aaron Burr — and his pro-Bank Federalist Party was out of power, while the Democratic-Republican Party was in control.
On April 27, 1810, (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530), the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification:
Maryland, Dec. 25, 1810
Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811
Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811
Delaware, Feb. 2, 1811
Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811
New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811
Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811
Tennessee, Nov. 21, 1811
Georgia, Dec. 13, 1811
North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811
Massachusetts, Feb. 27, 1812
New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812.
States that didn’t ratify in this time frame include:
Virginia
New York
South Carolina
Connecticut
Rhode Island
Apparently the nobility, lawyers, foreign bankers, and investors (British and Dutch respectively) weren’t too pleased with the passing of the 13th Amendment “Titles of Nobility” nor the non-renewal of the First Bank Charter, thus in 1812, war broke out between the UK and America.
The British had burned the Capitol, the Library of Congress, and most of the records of the first 38 years of government.
The momentum to ratify the proposed 13th Amendment “Titles of Nobility” was lost in the tumult of war.
The national debt soared from $45,209,737.90 to $99,833,660.15—~110%— and by 1816 reached $127,334,933.74— up 280% from 1812
January 1814- Congress received a petition signed by 150 businessmen from New York City, urging the legislative body to create a second national bank. In February, and again in November, Calhoun put forth plans to create a bank that would be headquartered in the District of Columbia, but his bills did not pass.
April 1814- President James Madison, who had opposed the creation of the First Bank of the United States in 1791, reluctantly admitted to the need for another national bank to finance the war with Britain.
April 1816- After much debate and a couple of additional attempts, Madison finally signed an act establishing the second Bank of the United States in Philadelphia with another twenty year charter.
November 1816- James Monroe, Republican, was elected president.
Back to the 13th Amendment and its ratification by the States. It currently had 12 states ratify and needed 13 out of the 17 to be added to the Constitution.
December 31, 1817- the House of Representatives resolved that President Monroe inquire into the status of the 13th Amendment. In a letter dated February 6, 1818, President Monroe reported to the House that the Secretary of State Adams had written to the governors of Virginia, South Carolina and Connecticut to tell them that the proposed Amendment had been ratified by twelve States and rejected by two (New York and Rhode Island), and asked the governors to notify him of their legislature's position. (House Document No. 76)
"Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that there shall be published an edition of the Laws of this Commonwealth in which shall be contained the following matters, that is to say: the Constitution of the united States and the amendments thereto..."
To this day, the federal government never acknowledges the passing of the original 13th Amendment. They concede that twelve states voted to ratify this Amendment between 1810 and 1812. But they argue that ratification require thirteen states, so the Amendment lays stillborn in history, unratified for lack of a just one more state's support—One vote.
In 1819, the Supreme Court case of McCulloch v Maryland ruled in two parts:
Chartering the Second Bank of the United States was within the power of the federal government
The state of Maryland could not constitutionally tax a legitimate operation of the federal government.
Panic of 1819. The Bank responded to the crisis in ways that seemed only to make the depression worse, reigniting public resentment against it. After all, wasn’t the Bank supposed to prevent such crises? The Panic of 1819 and the Bank's lackluster response sowed the seeds of its destruction. Anger towards the Bank was once again on the rise, and one man knew how to use it: Andrew Jackson.
1824, Andrew Jackson, who felt the election was stolen from him in 1824 when he had won the popular vote and the electoral vote over three other candidates but didn’t reach the 131 necessary electoral votes to win (split amongst the other three candidates and allowed the House to elect John Quincy Adams, Democrat-Republican), was an ardent opposer to the National Bank.
1828 Andrew Jackson wins presidency garnering 56% of the popular vote and 68% of the electoral vote
Dealing with corruption and problems in his own cabinet (intentional distractions? Sound Familiar?) he hardly had time to deal with the Bank but nonetheless had contributed to significantly reducing the national debt down to $7,001,698.83 by 1832 (a far cry from the $127M it was in 1816).
1832 Senator Henry Clay, Jackson’s opponent in the Presidential election of that year, proposed rechartering the Bank early. Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky, Jackson’s opponent in the election, supported the Bank of the United States.
1832 Jackson won his re-election in a landslide against Henry Clay and immediately went to work against the Second Bank. He knew that the bank attempted to influence the elections and control of Congress (nothing new under the sun) stating: "This great and powerful institution had been actively engaged in attempting to influence the elections of the public officers by means of its money...It being thus established by unquestionable proof that the Bank of the United States was converted into a permanent electioneering engine...The efforts of the Bank to control public opinion, through the distresses of some and the fears of others...Through presses known to have been sustained by its money it attempts by unfounded alarms to create a panic in all."
1835, during the “War on the Bank” Jackson survived an assassination attempt when Richard Lawrence fired two pistols at him at point blank range. God was watching over him though and both of Lawrence’s pistols misfired and Davy Crockett, who was there, wrestled and disarmed him.
1836, the last year of Jackson’s presidency, the national debt was paid in full and the Charter for the Second Bank failed to renew.
DEPOSIT ACT OF 1836 provided for the distribution of approximately $30 million of the $35 million U.S. Treasury surplus (from tariff proceeds and public land sales), to state banks on the basis of each state's representation in Congress.
The last stockholder meeting for the Bank of the United States took place on February 19, 1836, and like clockwork was quickly followed by the most severe economic depression in American history: the Panic of 1837.
1830’s Arkansas (slave state) and Michigan (free state) become states in the Union (1:1)
1830’s Territories of Wisconsin and Iowa are organized
1830’s Texas has a Revolution - declares Independence
1830’s The Bank of England raised interest rates from 3% to5% which in turn forces America’s local state banks to do the same.
1830’s The rise in interest rates dropped the value of American securities such as cotton which crushed the Southern States’ agricultural economies
1830’s State-chartered banks and bankers (intentionally?) over-lent money compared to its reserves causing inflation and recession.
1830’s America’s wheat crop was killed off driving the price and causing starvation.
1830’s Specie Circular forced the purchases of land in silver/gold which drove the market in a downward spiral
Deposit and Distribution Act of 1836 placed federal revenues in various local banks, derisively termed "pet banks", across the country. This dropped reserves and forced loans to restrict causing more panic.
The American people believed the cause of the depression and economic panic was domestic political conflict. Jacksonian Democrats believed it was the fault of the bankers. Whigs believed it was because of Jackson and the loss of the Second Bank charter. (sound familiar?)
National Debt increases to $10,434,221.14 in 1839.
1840’s Texas (slave state), Florida (slave state), Iowa (free state), and Wisconsin (free state) become states of the Union. (2:2)
1840’s Oregon and Minnesota become organized Territories.
1840’s The Whig Party takes over control of the Federal Government. The party platform endorsed revenue tariffs that generated significant federal funds- some tariffs as high as 20% on imported goods.
1840’s James Polk (Democrat) becomes president and quickly signed into law what became known as the Walker Tariff. The Walker Tariff moved rates downward towards revenue-only levels and dropped the policy of an ad valorem rate (a percent of the value of the goods) in favor of a set rate regardless of the value. A few commodities were listed as duty-free. Southern States supported and virtually all Northern States opposed.
1840’s United States declares war on Mexico. For most opponents the war was a transparent attempt to extend slavery into new territories that would become new slave states, thus ensuring that the South would control Congress and the presidency into the foreseeable future.
Despite a large portion of the war funded by Federal Government funds garnered from tariffs, the National Debt still increased to $63,061,858.69 in 1849 in the aftermath of the war.
1840’s Land acquired from the Mexican-American War (Mexican Cession- Present day California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of New Mexico and Colorado) sparks more political slavery conflict making it the primary political agenda.
1840’s Southern States start seriously threatening secession due to mounting economic problems from the anti-slavery sentiment and the associated potential power loss in Congress, and suffocating high tariffs.
1840’s Media on both sides of the political spectrum foment division and agitation regarding tariffs and slavery—both for and against—each using satirical propaganda and ridicule of their opponent’s political and economical positions. (Sound familiar?)
By 1849 the national debt was already back to $63,061,858.69.
1850’s to 1861 California (free state), Minnesota (free state), and Oregon (free state) become states in the Union. (3:0)
1850’s to 1861 Washington organizes into a Territory. (potential new free state)
The creation of the New Mexico Territory and the Utah Territory in 1850, the Kansas Territory in 1854, and the Colorado Territory in 1861 moved the boundaries of one of the western territories, New Mexico, north of the 36º 30' slavery line, making them all potential new free states.
1850’s to 1861 More Political parties divide and form. Democrats form the Northern Democrat Party (anti-slavery) and Southern Democrat Party (pro-slavery), and the Whig Party splits into the Republican Party (north; anti-slavery) and the southern Whigs join the Southern Democrat Party (pro-slavery).
1850’s to 1861 Democrats lowered tariffs further. An economic panic hit soon thereafter, precipitating a fall-off in imports in the wake of the recession that followed. Government revenues plummeted by 30 percent. In response, the brand new Republican Party called for higher tariffs
The National Debt rose as high as $68,304,796.02 in 1851, as low as $28,699,831.85 in 1857, and then back up to $58,496,837.88 in 1859.
1850’s to 1861 Media on both sides of the political spectrum continue to stoke the flames of division regarding tariffs and slavery.
“The party favored the preservation of slavery in the states in which it already existed. Preservation of slavery in those states meant that slaves would still have only the Constitutionally mandated three-fifths representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Full representation would give the South more members in the House of Representatives. That would threaten northern dominance in the House on the tariff issue.”
“They also opposed westward expansion of slavery into the new territories. If southern planters were allowed to take their slaves with them to the fertile new lands in the West, they might take political control there when the territory became a state. Because the margin of power was so narrow, two new senators, voting with the South against the tariff, were the stuff of nightmares for the northern tariff men.”
Within a little more than a month of Lincoln’s election states start seceding beginning with South Carolina in December 1860.
By February 8, 1861 (a month before Lincoln’s 3/4/1861 inauguration date) South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas formed the Confederacy and established their own government.
After the war began on April 12, 1861, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina seceded as well. Missouri and Kentucky would also later join the Confederate government. (13*)
Tensions in the United States of America are EXCEEDINGLY HIGH over the issues of:
slavery
power of the states over the Federal Government
exceedingly high Federal tariffs affecting the Southern States (agricultural economy).
Confederate States defecting and starting their own form of government.
The North/Union considered them “insurrectionists” under the “Insurrection Act of 1807”
1861, another proposed amendment, also numbered thirteen, was signed by President Lincoln. This was the only proposed amendment that was ever signed by a president. That resolve to amend read:
"ARTICLE THIRTEEN, No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State." (In other words, President Lincoln had signed a resolve that would have permitted slavery, and upheld states' rights.) Only one State, Illinois, ratified this proposed amendment before the Civil War broke out in 1861.
March 7, 1861 Lincoln appoints Congressmen Salmon P. Chase to Secretary of Treasury to help find a way to finance the Civil War. (war = expensive)
April 12, 1861 Confederate artillery fired first shots of Civil War.
April 15, 1861 Proclamation 80—Calling Forth the Militia and Convening an Extra Session of Congress
April 30, 1861 James Buchanan proposed a 13th Amendment. Without using the word "slavery" or "slave," the proposed amendment would deny "to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State." The amendment, officially designated Joint Resolution No. 80, passed the House of Representatives in late February by the convincing vote of more than two-thirds of the membership. It was delivered to the Senate just days before Lincoln’s inauguration and although most members of that body supported it, opponents were successful in blocking the amendment on a parliamentary technicality. Lincoln sent the amendment to the states for consideration. Only Ohio and Maryland ratified it. The copy of the amendment provided here is the one sent to Maryland for approval
July 17, 1861 Congress passed the first of Chase’s proposals and enabled the Treasury to borrow up to $250 Million for the war effort by issuing bonds and notes called “Demand Notes” coming in denominations of 5, 10, and 20 which could circulate as “money”.
The general numbering of Executive Orders began in 1907 by the Department of the (Deep) State, which assigned numbers to all the orders in their files (Lord 1944, viii). Despite the fact that many presidents wrote declarations/proclamations/executive actions/orders, they started numbering them beginning with Abraham Lincoln. See below.
January 27, 1862 Abraham Lincoln, acting as Commander in Chief, wrote General War Order 1 .
February 14, 1862 EDWIN M. STANTON The Secretary of War by order of Commander in Chief/President Abraham Lincoln signs Executive Order 1 to direct the federal government Relating to Political Prisoners due to “Insurrection” of the Southern States (beginning the direct federal rule by the Commander in Chief).
Chase was instrumental in establishing the National Banking Act of 1863 and 1864. 1863 Act was known as National Currency Act, (ch. 58, 12 Stat. 665; February 25, 1863) which established the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) External, as well as a national currency- later called “greenbacks”.
April 24, 1863, U.S. President Abraham Lincoln “General Orders No. 100: Instructions for the Government of the Armies of the United States in the Field,” commonly known as the “Lieber Code” after its main author Francis (Franz) Lieber. The Lieber Code set out rules of conduct during hostilities for Union soldiers throughout the U.S. Civil War. Even today, it remains the basis of most regulations of the laws of war for the United States and is referred to in the foreword to the Department of Defense Laws of War Manual
You can go through all of these but for the sake of this discussion we will only point a few of the Articles that are relevant to this discussion: Read slowly and understand.
A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.
The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.
Art. 3.
Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.
The commander of the forces may proclaim that the administration of all civil and penal law shall continue either wholly (or in part, as in times of peace), unless otherwise ordered by the military authority.
Art. 7.
Martial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government.
Art. 26.
Commanding generals may cause the magistrates and civil officers of the hostile country to take the oath of temporary allegiance or an oath of fidelity to their own victorious government or rulers, and they may expel everyone who declines to do so. But whether they do so or not, the people and their civil officers owe strict obedience to them as long as they hold sway over the district or country, at the peril of their lives.
Art. 31.
A victorious army appropriates (seizes) all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance (suspension) during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.
Art. 32.
A victorious army, by the martial power inherent in the same, may suspend, change, or abolish, as far as the martial power extends, the relations which arise from the services due, according to the existing laws of the invaded country, from one citizen, subject, or native of the same to another.
The commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change. (remember this part as it becomes pertinent LAW).
So in summary: Martial Law consists of the suspension of criminal and civil law and of the domestic administration and government, by the occupying military authority (based in Washington DC, at the time the CiC was Abraham Lincoln), and extends to all its citizens and their property of occupied territory (all of us or anyone opposed to this new occupying power). The Commanding General of the occupying military can require an oath of allegiance and fidelity from the civil officers and the people to the Occupying Power or be removed and/or be executed. The victorious army will seize all public money and all public movable property for its own benefit, and the revenues of real property belonging to the losing government will remain suspended during military occupation of the occupying power until the conquest is made complete. Then by martial law, they can suspend, change, or abolish the relations from services due of the existing laws of the invaded country from all people or entities. Once a peace treaty is met they can settle the permanency of these changes. (Except……. NO PEACE TREATY WAS EVER SIGNED .)
September 15, 1863 Proclamation 104—Suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus Throughout the United States
The National Bank Act of 1864 (ch. 106, 13 Stat. 99; June 3, 1864) reaffirmed the status of the OCC and established federal authority over the issuance of national bank charters, leading to a more uniform system for the establishment of banks in the United States.
July 5, 1864 Proclamation 113—Declaring Martial Law and a Further Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus in Kentucky
November 8, 1864 Lincoln re-elected President
On January 31, 1865 another 13th Amendment (which prohibited slavery in Sect. 1, and ended states' rights in Sect. 2,) was proposed.
April 9, 1865 General Lee's surrendered at Appomattox Court House in a private home owned by the McLean family. The Confederate government never surrendered and even had it wanted to the United States government would likely not have accepted. To do so would have legally acknowledged the existence of the Confederate States of America and would have legitimized it and given it certain legal status internationally.
Fun Fact: MCLEAN (Virginia) = CIA HQ (present day)
April 14, 1865 President Lincoln (who, in 1861, had signed the proposed Amendment that would have allowed slavery and states rights) was assassinated.
December 6, 1865 the "new" 13th Amendment prohibiting slavery (and quietly surrendering states’ rights to the federal government by giving Congress the power to enforce authority over the states) was ratified.
1866 Congress proposed the 14th Amendment
“Before an amendment can be ratified, it must first be proposed. The Constitution provides two methods of proposing an amendment: by two thirds of the states or by two thirds of both houses of Congress . The congressional method was used in the case of the 14th amendment (because it was NOT the states’ wishes and it did not and would not have passed willingly, seeing as it strips the states’ and their sovereigns rights further).
Read this very detailed explanation
When Congress proposed the amendment, twenty-three Senators were unlawfully excluded (U.S. Constitution, Article 5) from the U. S. Senate, in order to secure a two thirds vote for the adoption of proposed amendment.
When an amendment is proposed by the Congress, it must be “ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths … When the proposed amendment was sent to the states for ratification, there were thirty-seven states in the Union. This means that ratification required the approval of twenty-eight states. Said another way, it would only take ten states rejecting the amendment to defeat it. The proposed 14th amendment was sent to the states for ratification in June of 1866. By March 1867, twenty states had ratified and thirteen had rejected the proposed amendment. This means that the amendment failed.”
May, 1865, President Andrew Johnson issued a Proclamation of Amnesty for former southern rebels. This action was in keeping with President Lincoln’s wishes to heal the nation.
In 1866, President Andrew Johnson promoted Ulysses S. Grant to General of the Army.
President Andrew Johnson proclaimed in Proclamation 157--declaring that peace, order, tranquility, and civil authority now exists in and throughout the whole of the United States of America on August 20, 1866. (Is there really peace though?)
After learning that the proposed amendment’s failure, the U.S. Congress passed the Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867.
This act overthrew and annulled this existing state governments of the ten southern states that rejected the amendment. Recall that these governments had just been established in 1865. The act placed these states under military rule and required the ratification of the proposed amendment before they could be readmitted to representation in Congress
President Andrew Johnson vetoed.
President Johnson went on to point out that each of the southern states had legitimate governments. “It is not denied that the States in question have each of them an actual government with all the powers, executive, judicial, and legislative, which properly belong to a free State. They are organized like the other States of the Union, and, like them, they make, administer, and execute the laws which concern their domestic affairs."
1. Johnson felt the Military Reconstruction Act was an "unconstitutional extension of federal power into areas of state jurisdiction."
2. Johnson felt that despotism would occur when the army had authority over elected civil officials.
3. Johnson felt that the Civil War had proven that the Union was indivisible, and that the Military Reconstruction Act was treating the southern states as though they were conquered territories.
Congress (select congressmen blackmailed and/or controlled) was undaunted as it overrode the President’s veto of the Reconstruction Act. After the Reconstruction Act was passed, two states (Nebraska and Iowa) ratified the proposed amendment, and three states (New Jersey, Ohio and Oregon) reversed their ratifications. So, without considering the actions taken under reconstruction, the final tally was (19) for, (16) against, and (2) (California and Tennessee) not acting.
As a result of the Reconstruction Acts (3 were passed in total between the dates of March 2 and July 19, 1867) the 10 southern states were organized into military districts. Their lawfully constituted legislature was illegally removed by “military force” and they were replaced by illegitimate legislatures. 7 of these legislatures eventually ratified the 14thAmendment in 1868.
14th Amendment makes us all US citizens and thus ALL debt slaves giving the federal government more power over the people than the states, and removed our sovereignty “for our protection”.
During Reconstruction the 14th and 15th Amendments were passed.
This is what Congressional corruption looks like without the original 13th Amendment banning foreign influence. War and Debt.
Funny how the US Supreme Court wouldn’t even rule on the constitutionality of what just happened. See:
Despite Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) this previous ruling in 1803 that determined that Congress does not have the power to pass laws that override the Constitution, such as by expanding the scope of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction. The original Constitution gave the power to each state to be independently sovereign.
So, anyone who fought for the Confederates no longer had a say in their governments and since they were forced by the military to ratify and their governments annulled and reformed under the Reconstruction Act, "everyone agreed" and it became "law" that they later strictly and abundantly enforced.
But either way because of the 13th and 14th amendments, any uprising against this government was squashed and dissenters thought of as insurrectionists/rebellions were removed by the military.
But I thought the war was over? and peace was called for? So what gives unless all under martial law still?
Ulysses S. Grant A “war hero” to the people for helping free slaves was unanimously nominated by the Republican Party and then elected president in 1868.
Salmon P. Chase (remember him?) resides as Chief Justice, and presided at the impeachment trial of U.S. President Andrew Johnson in 1868. (This guy who had no experience in finances becomes Sec. of Treasury, and later ALSO Chief Justice?? WOW)
December 25, 1868 Proclamation 179—Granting Full Pardon and Amnesty for the Offense of Treason Against the United States During the Late Civil War
April 20th - April 29th, 1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to the Executive Branch giving it the power to continue to carry out martial law nearly five years after the end of the Civil War.
April 28, 1870: Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:
“If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice.
“In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited. The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.
“But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill. If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.
“But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States.”
What is interesting, is it was Congressmen Lawrence who also advocated and proposed the Bill H.R. 379 To Established a Law Department in the first place on April 5, 1869, after Congress failed to create it in 1830. They had been gunning for this for a long time.
Under “military rule”, under control by the United States government/Congress, who sits at the top of the Command?
President as Commander in Chief with Executive/General Order power.
It also gives Congress power over the States, and the amendments added give the United States government supreme authority over all its “citizens”.
On June 22, 1870, President U.S. Grant signed H.R. 1328 into law.
There is a broad expansion of power under a declared state of emergency, just as in Lincoln using the military according to the Insurrection Act and acting as Commander in Chief.
According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are *ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.
If only Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under the Legislative branch?
And if only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive branch?
The Commerce Department:
“…There shall be at the seat of government an executive department to be known as the Department of Commerce and Labor, and a Secretary of Commerce and Labor,.”
HERE’S THE REAL KICKER—THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS
The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority (expansion of powers) to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335).
Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government.
Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion.
Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws.
»Section 333 was enacted to implement the 14th Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state.
Above all else, we are United States Citizens per the 14th Amendment.
Also we are Debt Slaves per Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, so in the meantime, behind the scenes, the national debt that Jackson worked so hard to get paid off all of a sudden is becoming insurmountable due to the Civil War:
February 18th, 1871 during the 41st Congress, as noted in Section 34, Session III, Chapters 61 and 62, Congress passed an Act titled: “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia” aka “The Act of 1871”.
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land, and named it “the District of Columbia”.
President Ulysses S. Grant (former Commanding General of the Union Army) signed it on February 21, 1871
In the Act,
Sec 1: the government by the name of the “District of Columbia was constituted a "body corporate for municipal purposes," with power to make contracts, sue and be sued, and "to exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States. (Remember, the recently added amendments 13, 14, and 15 are a part of the Constitution now.)
Sec 2: The Executive power and authority in and over DC shall be vested in the governor, who shall be appointed by the President and Congress.
Sec 4: President will appoint a Secretary of DC that will have the power of an elector. Every law made and action taken must be presented to the President and Congress for their use.
Sec 5 - Sec 31: Setting up the government, all its offices, processes, and its organization.
Sec 32: Gives power to Congress and the government of the United States as the employer all positions of power/authority in the District of Columbia, including governor, police, secretary, clerks, security through sergeant-at-arms, by paying them through the Treasury of the United States
“…and governed solely by the instructions of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States (under the Executive Office now)…” and further by Congress. “He who has the gold makes the rules.”
Municipal is defined as “of, or relating to, having a local self-government, or issued on the authority of a local or state government”.
Corporation is defined as “An entity such as a business, municipality, or organization, that involves more than one person but that has met the legal requirements to operate as a single person, so that it may enter into contracts and engage in transactions under its own identity; Such a body created for purposes of government, and/or A group of people combined into or acting as one body.”
Shortly after passing the Act of 1871, Congress then passed H.R. 320 An Act to enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other purposes. (To enforce the US Citizen title over the State Sovereign.)
Treaty of 1871 was enacted between Great Britain and the United States to avoid the debt clause of the 14th Amendment being called.
“Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)
“When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, it appears, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”--- “That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage--- So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia--- the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: “Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct....... U.S. Corp is not merely an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia); rather, it is a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.” ---- Team Law analysis.”
This isn’t public opinion, this is Judicial Opinion.
And coming out of District of Columbia v. Hutton, 143 U.S. 18 (1892), we have another legal supporting opinion.
Translation: The land that belongs to the federal government (United States) within the area of land known as the District of Columbia shall be created into a government named the District of Columbia. First there’s an area of land called D.C., and now there is a government called D.C. This government and legislature will operate under authority by a governor (despite not being a state) who will be selected by the President first, then elected by people 4 years later who are now citizens (not sovereigns; thank you 14th Amendment) of the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia government does nothing without the expressed written and legal approval from The United States government, who also pays the governor, secretary, and others in authority inside the District through the Treasury (where do they get their money from?).
So, in short, the District of Columbia, while on paper looks like a “sovereign state”, it was NOT formed by We The People, but rather by legislation of the United States Congress into an incorporated municipality completely separate politically. It talks of the District of Columbia being constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, grants in powers, terms and appointments of a Governor, qualifications for Governor, the powers and duties of the Governor (including veto power), and that Congress and the President shall give advice and consent to said Governor, elections, and official entries of all elected officials in proceedings, with all provisions of operation, that look and act exactly like the original Constitution for the United States of America, but it’s not.
All of that sounds really complicated- and it is. Let’s just say that is all too much to take in and you don’t understand. Let’s just take a look at how the US CODE defines the United States:
US CODE: 28 U.S. Code § 3002 (15) (A)
(15)“United States” means—a Federal corporation
1877-1881 Elements of ecclesiastical law: The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone.
(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844-1895 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44) (Ctrl/Command + F “obligatory”)
In 1893, a massive bank panic (bank runs) coincided with the worst depression the United States had ever seen, and by the early months of 1895, things were getting desperate for US President Grover Cleveland.
The country's economy was collapsing because of falling prices and rising unemployment that began with the Panic of 1893. Eighteen months later, millions were unemployed and the treasury’s reserves were dropping too.
January 24, 1895, the Treasury has only $68 million. Scarcely a week later it was down $45 million. President Cleveland tried to avert the disaster. With Treasury Secretary John Carlisle, the President had proposed a plan to sell government bonds to the public to raise $60 million.
The concern at the White House grew even more when Carlisle confidentially advised the President that the Treasury had $9 million gold reserves, and that a single investor held a draft worth $10 million. Insolvency of the government was inevitable unless a source of funding could be found – indeed a bailout of the U.S. government was the only hope.
J.P. Morgan “saved the day” by offering $100 Million in gold to the federal government, and President Cleveland only took $60 Million reluctantly.
As promised the bonds were sold and gold filled the Treasury. The run stopped and the economy stabilized. Morgan had co-signed for the U.S. debt and the economy took off. Morgan now stood to make millions more than he paid.
While all of this was happening, the Rothschilds also helped J.P. Morgan and the Drexels and Biddles of Philadelphia establish European branches of their respective banks in exchange for allowing the Rothschilds to control the banking industry in New York and, therefore, America.
After ANOTHER particularly bad bank panic (wonder who caused that???) and ensuing recession in 1907, the bankers and Congress decided it was time to reconsider a centralized national bank. (Central Bank)
The only people capable of stopping them and publicly opposed the Federal Reserve were on the “Titanic” in 1912. The same “Titanic” that J.P. Morgan was contracted to build, who also was scheduled to be aboard but canceled last minute. 1 year and 8 months after the sinking of the “Titanic”, the Federal Reserve (US Central Bank) is established in 1913. And who owns the Central Banks? Who loans to governments? THE SAME ILLUMINATI BANKERS who just so happen to be friends with J. P. Morgan who now also owns a large portion of the US Government’s Debt? The SAME ILLUMINATI BANKERS who funded the French Revolution, and own the Bank of England, thus also control over the Crown?
To honor him, Salmon P. Chase is on the $10,000 dollar bill—paper “money” that is now called Federal Reserve Notes still used as currency known as the “dollar” today.
They passed Paul Warburg’s federal reserve act of 1913, handing over Americas gold and silver reserves (and total control of America’s economy) to the Federal Reserve Bank.
Most Americans still believe the FED is owned by the government, but it is not.
The FED is a privately owned banking system whose majority class A shareholders include the Rothschild’s, Warburgs, J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller’s and the Lehman brothers.
Chase Bank and JPMorgan Chase would later be named after him.
Deposits in US Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654 and 655) and the reserves of gold and monies have been sent to the Federal Reserve per the Federal Reserve Act.
The Illuminati/Jacobin Club and the Bankers play both sides, create the real problem(s), create the real conflict, create the war, create the debt, create the hero, create the solution, and the people will not only go along, but they will beg for it.
(who financed bringing slaves here?)
(who brought tariffs to the South’s economy?)
(who was in bed with foreign interests?)
(who wanted the central banks?)
(who gained the power?)
Our country was founded by Sovereigns FOR Sovereigns where “Sovereign” is defined as: “independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction; chief or highest/supreme in power; superior to all positions”. WE control our government—they work for US. But We are no longer “Sovereign”, and WE are controlled by our new fraud government, working for THEM.
What happens when the United States Federal Government, who is about to become insolvent, KNOWINGLY sells Federal debt to non-elected domestic and foreign bankers/interests?
Would those non-elected domestic and foreign bankers/interests own and control the White House and the Federal Government?
Would that not be a form of Belligerent Occupation? (Infiltration, not Invasion?)
By removing our unalienable rights and replacing with relative (inalienable) rights and privileges, granted to us under the new 14th amendment, and by forming a new constitution/federal municipal corporation, with expansive Executive powers, beholden to non-elected domestic and foreign interests, our government committed TREASON against We The People.
We are presumed to “know the law” but we don’t, 1) because it’s not taught in our school system and 2) because it uses language that is above and beyond what normal and everyday people understand. Lawyers making law so complicated only they can understand.
Free will is a thing, and they needed to keep us in the dark in order to continue on their plan. They needed to get our “consent” even if it was consent through blind and willful/woeful ignorance. So, let’s look at how they bamboozled everyone.
The System:
There are three sovereign city-states that are separate from the countries in which they reside and they rule the world.
The flag in Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. ~ Albert T Milligan –
The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., London, and Vatican City.
London is the corporate and banking center of the three city states and controls the world financially and economically.
Washington’s District of Columbia city state is in charge of the military.
The Vatican is in charge of “spiritual” (satanic) guidance.
Some symbolism…At the CENTER of each city state are giant phallic shaped stone monuments called obelisks.
In D.C. the obelisk is known as the Washington monument. It was dedicated to George Washington by the Freemason Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia.
The secretive brotherhood of Freemasons laid the Washington obelisks cornerstone in 1848 and contributed 22 masonic memorial stones. 250 masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk including the knights templar masonic order.
An obelisk is a Babylonian symbol – It’s a symbol of Nimrod’s male organ.
America is a British Colony still.
(Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 41, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)Britain is owned by the Vatican. Therefore, the Vatican owns America.
(Treaty of 1213)This is why every President meets with the Pope since Woodrow Wilson.
Ever web search (in images) terms like “World leaders bow down to Pope”?
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States.
(Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.
(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.
(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.
(Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)“The People” does NOT include you and me.
(Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers.
(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)Everything in the “United States” is up for Sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake??
(Executive Order 12803)“We are human capital”.
(Executive Order 13037)The U.N.-United Nations has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. ) and now owns every man, woman and child in America. The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
Source: http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.htmlFederal ownership of land: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R42346.pdf
The IRS is Not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S (T-Bow Trust) et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
losthorizons.com/tax/Misunderstandings/irs_is_an_agency.htm - their argument against.
gov excuse is through congressional passage of 26 U.S. Code § 7802 - Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board making IRS under Department of Treasury.
Department of Treasury is Under Executive Branch now instead of Congress
But Remember, DC was formed into a corporation, controlled by Executive Branch and Congress, that is owned by the Federal Government, which sold its debt and was bought out and held by foreign interests, making it what?
don’t be duped by dupers
The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N.
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government, even though the “U.S. Government” held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US 491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
The Social Security (United States of America) Order by Queen Elizabeth 1997
According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826)
Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says “U.S. Department of Treasury” at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
You own NO property!!! Slaves can’t own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa. C.S.A. 502)
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 , Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-158)
We are enemies of the State (Trading with the Enemy Act 1933 Act of 1917 & 1933) Trading with the Enemy Act 1933 Act of 1917 & 1933 (People declared the Enemy) Oct. 6, 1917, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section 2 subdivision ( c ) Chapter 106 – Enemy defined “other than citizens of the United States…” March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows: “…any person within the United States.” See H.R. 1491 Public No. 1.
The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germany’s infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and "Fuhrer,"etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of International Settlements" is located. Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of "Government" in place. *
We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System under the petrodollar*
The UN is a One World Super Government. *
No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. *
Guess who owns the UN?
USA Military Flag (regular red white and blue)
USA Civil Peacetime Flag (vertical stripes)
THE USA Corporation Flag (Gold Fringe)
Some say it is a flag of Admiralty/Maritime type jurisdiction and is not supposed to be used on Land. Others say it’s not a flag at all, but fiction.
However, the gold fringe which surrounds the flag gives notice that the American flag has been captured and is now being used by the corporate so-called government to give notice of its jurisdiction.
The flag shown above with the gold fringe is Not described in Title 4 of USC and therefore is illegal on land except for maybe (1) the President since he is in charge of Naval Forces on high seas, and (2) naval offices and yards.
The so-called justification for a Naval/Maritime flag to be on land is that all land was under the high water mark at one time even if it was eons ago. (Great Flood anyone?? Bueller?)
Governing Body
-We thought our 3 branches of government were for checks and balances... HA. WRONG.
In the Corporate Law, with expanded Executive powers, let’s check out how it really works:
Link to Image quoted —Trump didn’t need to go through the Supreme Court as DACA was originally an Executive Order, therefore it should be overturned by the Commander in Chief/Caesar by Executive Order, or by 2/3 vote in Congress, but good luck getting that done seeing as so many in Congress are beholden to special interests.
Medium of Exchange
Was Gold and Silver, or at least backed by gold and silver, until FDR in 1933 and Nixon in 1971, but now we play with paper and digital money, that is basically a grandiose IOU created out of thin air, that the bankers collect back with interest, all designed to further the wealth disparity between the elite and The People.
Debt with interest is a system of perpetual debt continually passed on to the people beneath until the debt gap consumes all but those who own the debt. Further, they later started valuing the dollar based on the price of oil by using the price of oil (who owns the oil?) to create or deny wealth whatever country or region they saw fit. The Petro-Dollar. Instead of being a consistent price like gold, the price of oil was fluid therefore it made the value of the dollar fluid, thus wielding great power over whole nations and their governments and economies—including the USA. Anyone who didn’t tow the line was forced into economic depressions or recessions…
Sovereigns vs SUBJECTS
Look at the name on your Driver's Licenses, Social Security cards, Credit Cards, Deeds, Bank Accounts, etc. Your name in ALL CAPS, isn’t it? Although your name may be John Doe, the corporate entity that does business with the corporation, and is registered to it through the 14th amendment is known as JOHN DOE.
This is my real birth certificate. I took this picture and for obvious reasons edited out private information, although the letters for all names are the same as the rest of the letters on the certificate—capitalized. Please note the encircled small print. Fascinating, isn’t it? You are a corporate asset able to be bought and sold, sued and be sued, and enter into contracts per your new 14th Amendment citizenship status. We “freed slaves” by making “everyone (unwitting) debt slaves to the Corporation” by claiming we are all CITIZENS instead of SOVEREIGNS in the 14th Amendment.
Justice System vs "JUST-US" SYSTEM
-it really is set up to benefit (them) and not us. He who has control of the money has control over the laws of the land and thus the control of its people--- and in our case all US CITIZENS (corporate assets/property). You can attempt to fight the system however it is DESIGNED so that (you) always lose, and “they” always win.
Golden Rule: He who has the gold—makes the rules.
Prisons for Incarceration vs prisons for profit
More and more prisons today are privately owned and run as a profit-making commercial enterprise creating products and services for sale. It is believed that many judges, congressmen, and other federal officials hold stock or an interest in these privatized prisons. These commercially run prisons do not have the best interest of the inmates or staff in mind, but the bottom line--PROFIT. They need a continuous supply of low-cost labor (slaves) to produce products in order to increase profits. Even when the crime rate is down, these privateers lobby the appropriate governmental and judicial authorities to increase the incarceration rate in order to add to their already substantial profit taking. There are no checks and balances for monitoring this type of system.
States vs STATES
-All state governments today are corporations, not sovereign states.
-Only corporations are required to pay sales tax as entities of the corporate government.
-They got the CITIZENS to volunteer to pay up front sales tax on their behalf.
Thanks, Congress!
debt vs DEBT
-When a government goes bankrupt it loses its sovereignty (important to remember later)
-The US defaulted on some or all of its debt in 1790, 1861, 1933, and 1979
-Members of Congress are the official Trustees in the bankruptcy
Unalienable Rights vs Inalienable Rights
- “Government Privileges/Benefits”:
- Social Security
- Medicare
- Medicaid
- Grants
- Disaster relief
- Food Stamps
- Licenses and Registration (Permission)
- Privileges only, no Rights
- Experimentation on citizens without their consent.
Records
-birth certificate
-death certificate
-marriage license
-Miscegenation records
>>all held as records by the County Clerk Office to keep track of the corporate government’s holdings which are applied as collateral to the increasing debt
Free Enterprise vs Corporatism (USMCA)
-The thing created (the corporation) becomes more powerful than the creator (man) who created it. Man is no longer free but is subservient (a slave) to the corporate structure. The corporate structure needs to reduce the wages of its human resources to decrease cost to increase profit to keep growing.
-Corporations eat each other and grow bigger and more powerful thereby allowing fewer persons having big egos controlling the lives of the common folk from cradle to grave.
Schools vs Human Resource Development
-Public Schools are actually government schools paid for by forced taxation whether they want it or not.
-Teaches blind obedience to the central STATE.
-Similar to Nazi Germany.
GUNS
-In order to fully take over the US they will eventually have to take our guns because as it stands now, the largest standing military in the world BY FAR is the US Militia (populace who own guns) along with the world’s largest stockpile of weapons and ammunition.
Militia vs Military
-(they) used our People, who were sovereigns, and their desire to protect America as justification to form and use the US Military as a tool to destroy other dissenting sovereign nations/cultures.
Faith and Worship vs RELIGION
-Peep this, tax exemption is their permission from the government to exist
PROOF- is the government telling churches they have to close during Coronavirus despite it being a FIRST AMENDMENT right NOT requiring permission from the government to exist or operate.
You think it stops there?
This wasn’t just for the United States of America
They hit Canada at the same time
https://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1871.html
And Germany
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_German_Confederation_(1871)
And subsequently went on to do the same to almost every sovereign nation
>>implement war
>>bankrupt whatever nation they want
>>implement corporatization of their government to ensure payback of debt
>>establish a central bank
>>add interest
>>perpetually indebt and enslave the world
What a giant mess we are in.
Thank God for God who wins in the end!
HERE COMES DONALD J. TRUMP
And thank God for giving us Donald J. Trump, who appears to be working on the side of Humanity, with God’s blessing and protection, to undo this mess.
Let’s take a look.
Ok! Now that you understand we are all global corporate slaves and are extremely depressed by the size and gravity of it all, knowing there is nothing we as individuals can do to stop it, time for some lightening of the mood.
This is where it gets gooooooood!
How many times have you watched this video?
>>listen. very. carefully. (again).
>>Note past (6) years (2017-2023)
>>Note next (2) years (2023-2025)
>>You were told what was going to happen.
KNOWING WHAT YOU JUST WATCHED AND READ ABOUT CORPORATE AMERICA (globally too) WHO AND WHAT DO YOU THINK HE’S TALKING ABOUT????????
Actions speak louder than words so let's analyze everything DJT has done during his presidency:
Trump seemed to already know about this system and allowed the Supreme Court to try the DACA case just so he could provide precedent and so he can prove to the Dems that there’s NOTHING THAT CAN STOP WHAT’S COMING. >>Powers no one “knew/thought” the President had.
New Trade Deals for Free and/or Fair Enterprise
We need money to stop pouring out of our nation so that we can be prosperous and sovereign. Creating New Trade Deals and ending the bad ones, Donald Trump has secured Billions if not Trillions of additional revenue for our country.
President Donald J. Trump Has Secured a Historic Phase One Trade Agreement with China
U.S. and Japan strike trade deal ‘in principle’
Trump fulfills his signature promise and puts America first with USMCA trade deal
Canada, Mexico, China and Japan buy more than $62B of US agriculture
After China trade deal, Europe and UK next on Trump's to-do list
Trump's USMCA is not just biggest deal ever—it's an international game changer
and so many more that there are too many to list
>>He’s fixing the school system and common core which was used to create human resources.
-The Trump administration renewed its push for school choice on Thursday with a proposal to provide $5 billion a year in federal tax credits for donations made to groups offering scholarships for private schools, apprenticeships and other educational programs.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos unveiled the plan as a “bold proposal” to give students more choices without diverting money from public schools.
“What’s missing in education today is at the core of what makes America truly great: freedom,” DeVos said. “Kids should be free to learn where and how it works for them.”
The White House on Monday released its first stand-alone proposal for higher-education reform, urging the U.S. Congress to enact laws affecting accreditation, Pell Grants, and student-loan repayment.
The plan repeats themes raised in President Trump's 2020 federal budget proposal and reflects division between Democrats and Republicans over the federal government's role in regulating the forces that shape colleges and the for-profit sector.
Trump's budget proposal for 2020, released last week, includes a $7-billion cut in the U.S. Department of Education, a changed student-loan repayment process, and the elimination of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.
The last century has produced an American economy where more jobs than ever before require at least some postsecondary education or skill development. Wage premiums and job security continue to be associated with postsecondary education or skills attainment; however, the rising cost of college education and the accompanying growth in student loan balances erode the wage premium associated with a college degree.
Unironically, since COVID you have seen a potential closure of public schools? Is this a coincidence? Are we headed to more of an online schooling of choice? With the public school system you have far left teachers indoctrinating our children flat out lies about history, and against conservative values and freedom.
Online school? Some parents want to hire tutors, start mini schools this year.
SCHOOL CHOICE NOW ACT IS A BIG STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. NO MORE CRT. NO MORE LGBTQ IN SCHOOLS. NO MORE CHILD GROOMING BOOKS.
The Time for School Choice Is Now
Is COVID the catalyst that sets up the New Post-Corporate America?
We’re changing the corporate prison system and implementing criminal justice reform
THE IMPROBABLE SUCCESS OF A CRIMINAL-JUSTICE-REFORM BILL UNDER TRUMP
5D chess folks
President Wants to Use Executive Order to End Birthright Citizenship
»14th amendment
Through the system of birthright citizenship many people become citizens by just coming across the border and having a baby in the US. Fun little loophole. Voting Numbers, Representatives, and Demographics change when this happens.
Well national parks and monuments are land that is owned by the federal government. In this case, the corporation of the United States. Obama designated whatever he wanted as national monuments and Trump said it was a wild abuse of power. Why. Bc if the federal government is operated out of DC and its assets now include America’s land then they can sell those lands to other countries. Corporate law.
Obama then gave eminent domain to China
This is a big problem as you can see now. China has now completely infiltrated America’s schools, businesses, manufacturing, land, and real estate.
He also signed an Executive Order in regards to China on 7/14/2020
That basically says, If you have any relationship, any connection, directly or indirectly, in business, in real estate, in land, in anything, to anyone in the CCP then the US just blocked your assets. We will be taking back what’s ours now. Can’t have a sovereign nation with other countries owning your country’s assets.
USPS reform
You should really really really read this article first then the rest of what you see in regards to the USPS will start making more sense.
Have you ever noticed that USPS.gov doesn’t exist and instead takes you to USPS.com?
If they’re a government entity then how come they don’t use .gov?
Trump orders an evaluation of the Postal Service following his criticism of Amazon
Trump's Postal Reform Proposals Met With Criticism From Lawmakers, USPS Management
Unironically AGAIN, COVID and Mail-In voting has caused the USPS some serious problems. They failed their audit as well.
With Trump donor in charge, Postal Service may shut locations and cut service before Election Day
Did we discover their voting fraud schemes and are now overseeing and preventing voting fraud?
Senator, union leader: Postal Service considers downsizing
USPS audit finds election day issues with 3rd-party carrier, sorting machines, computer glitches.
The US Postal Service is crucial in gaining back our sovereignty and here we are strategically placed to not only potentially bust them for allowing, unwitting or wittingly, voter fraud, whilst also getting office locations to close. They’re running out of money…. Gee.. I wonder why that is?
He even promised full tax reform (income taxation through corporation is unlawful)
While he hasn’t gotten completely rid of taxes, he can’t quite yet bc of corporate law still being in place with corrupt politicians
Trump tax breaks for low-income neighborhoods draw scrutiny
But it’s coming
Incredibly Unironic again, COVID seems to be giving Americans tax breaks again. PPP helping with Payroll and EIDL helping with small business working capital.
Trump doubles down on call for payroll tax cut through end of 2020
So what does Trump do?
END WARS
>Trump wants out of ‘endless war,’ but pulling troops from northeast Syria could bring bloodshed
>Trump wants to pull all U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by 2020 election, officials say
>United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
>House Votes to Speed Up End to Afghanistan War
>In separate votes, the House passed a proposal to repeal the 2002 congressional authorization for the war in Iraq as well as a plan to prevent tax dollars from being used to take military action against Iran without congressional approval. Repeal of the 2002 authorization was approved by a 236-166 vote, while the funding measure on Iran passed 228-175.
Killing off ISIS to end the war on terrorism
>Trump Orders Baghdad Strike That Killed Iranian General
>Trump: ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead
>Trump appears to confirm killing of al Qaeda leader in Yemen via retweet
PEACE and ECONOMIC DEALS
>Israel signs accords with United Arab Emirates and Bahrain at White House ceremony
>HERE IT COMES: The Middle East Peace Plan
>Trump gets peace with North Korea and South Korea and ends the Korean War
When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty.
We got to get rid of the Federal Reserve, the high bank of the Corporation
Gold ends the FED
>Trump Favors Returning To The Gold Standard
>'Audit the Fed' bill gets new push under Trump
>Trump Fed pick’s push for gold troubles lawmakers
Unironically AGAIN, COVID caused financial crises allowing DJT to absorb the Federal Reserve, in March 2020, into the US Dept of Treasury for the purpose of being able to protect the public and private economy from fall-out. This man, DJT, is SOOO SMART.
Meet your New Fed Chairman, Donald J. Trump
You’re probably asking yourself, “how are we getting all of this money to give to the Citizens for Economic Relief due to COVID? If we are taking it from the FED aren’t we more in debt?”
>If the US Dept of Treasury owns the FED then the Federal Government owns the debt. If DJT owns our debt do we really even have debt?
Even better, Donald Trump is using what is known as the ESF, or Exchange Stabilization Fund to fund our Economic Recovery. On paper it is controlled by the US Treasury but operated by the Federal Reserve as a means of stabilizing the value of the dollar. Since there isn’t any gold to back it up, they can either inject or withdraw dollar amounts from this fund in order to maintain a certain value of that dollar. They also then adjust interest rates as well. This ESF, pulls money from the IRS (your tax dollars) to fund itself.
Officially in charge of defending the dollar, the ESF is the government agency which controls the New York Fed, runs the CIA’s black budget, and is the architect of the world’s monetary system (IMF, World Bank, etc).
Check Bloomberg article above for reference on ESF
THE DS USES YOUR MONEY TO DO WHATEVER IT WANTS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT AND WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY
It is estimated that since its inception they have taken HUNDREDS of TRILLIONS of dollars from US tax dollar coffers. (Read that again.)
Interesting that we own the Fed and the ESF now, isn’t it?
Interesting these photos now that you know what you know:
THEY’RE WEARING BLACK LIKE ITS A FUNERAL— BAHAHAHAHAHAHA
See ya, sucka!!!
In order to uphold the CONSTITUTION for the United States of America we need to get rid of these corporate corrupt judges
Including those who sit at the top of the US SUPREME COURT (corporate) to Constitutional based Supreme Court Justices
Trump’s two Supreme Court justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch split in first term together
Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a Constitutional Justice
Donald Trump and the Plot to Take Over the Courts. How the 45th president has packed the courts with ultra-conservatives—and reshaped the judiciary for a generation.
In order for the corporation to truly take over and usher in full blown communism/dictatorship they need to take our guns. Not under Donald Trump’s watch
Trump vows to 'always uphold the Second Amendment' amid ongoing talks on gun laws
And don’t forget this:
If I had to guess, I’d say He’s going to use the assets of their criminal actions to pay off the debt hundreds of times over. These Criminals had MANY years of money, gold, silver, etc hoarding and those assets will be the very assets that set our Republic FREE of Corporate Rule.
Trump mentioned sovereignty 21 times in a speech heralding a new American worldview
“Our success depends on a coalition of strong and independent nations that embrace their sovereignty, to promote security, prosperity, and peace, for themselves and for the world.”
“We do not expect diverse countries to share the same cultures, traditions, or even systems of government, but we do expect all nations to uphold these two core sovereign duties: to respect the interests of their own people and the rights of every other sovereign nation.”
We will take back this country for you
And we will Make America Great Again
DJT
>>You have more than you know
>>He has been telling us from the beginning
>>And...
>>>Every action he has taken has been to undo the Act of 1871 and the Corporation formed because of it, and to finally FREE OUR NATION. Not only that but the reason all of these other nations are so willing to join him and make deals is because he’s promising them sovereignty.
MAGA MEGA Global Great Awakening
The People of the World Will Be Slaves No MOAR
He’s DOING It.
I can see clearly now; the reign is gone.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE EXTREMELY DETAILED FINANCIAL DETAILS OF ALL OF THIS PLEASE READ THE PRUSSIA GATE SERIES WRITTEN BY GOOD FRIENDS OF MINE.
References:
https://otterson.org/thetimes/the-1600s-the-english-civil-war/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/timeline/civilwars_timeline_noflash.shtml
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/old-new-london/vol1/pp453-473
https://classroom.synonym.com/political-power-british-monarchy-8073.html
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/THM1756?OpenDocument
https://uscode.house.gov/download/annualhistoricalarchives/pdf/OrganicLaws2012/confederation.pdf
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/americanrevolution/timeline.htm
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/02/how-was-the-revolutionary-war-paid-for/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_costs_of_the_Seven_Years%27_War
http://theamericanhistory.org/1791-american-history-summary.html
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/treaty-of-paris
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
https://www.thoughtco.com/french-revolution-timeline-1221901
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/civil_war_france.pdf
https://founders.archives.gov/?q=organic%20act%20of%201801&s=1111311111&sa=&r=5&sr=
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-07-02-0027
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=honors
https://www.martyduren.com/2016/03/04/a-brief-history-on-american-political-parties/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_the_United_States
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/06-02-02-0435
https://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw2.021/?q=Illuminati&sp=182&st=text
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-26-02-0001-0201
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/duel-burr-conspiracy/
https://currentpub.com/2020/06/02/the-history-behind-the-insurrection-act-of-1807/
https://govtrackus.s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/2/STATUTE-2-Pg443a.pdf
https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/february/first-bank-united-states-chartered
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo1.htm
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/first-bank-of-the-us
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/second-bank-of-the-us
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/the-missing-13th-amendment/titles-of-nobility.php
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/the-missing-13th-amendment/what-if.php
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-36-02-0027-0001
https://www.congress.gov/bill/7th-congress/house-bill/31/1803/02/10/text?s=7&r=176
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=002/llsl002.db&recNum=140
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/duel-burr-conspiracy/
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/99-01-02-4616
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llsl//llsl-c9/llsl-c9.pdf
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/the-missing-13th-amendment/titles-of-nobility.php
https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/first-bank-of-the-us
https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/bank-war
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo1.htm
https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/treasures_of_congress/text/page9_text.html
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs155/1108762609255/archive/1114104639498.html
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/missouri-compromise
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/24750/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-salmon-chase
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=012/llsl012.db&recNum=696
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=013/llsl013.db&recNum=128
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1/chapter-I/subchapter-E/part-19
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-no-1-relating-political-prisoners
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-general-war-order-no-1
https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2018/04/the-lieber-code-the-first-modern-codification-of-the-laws-of-war/
https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/constitution.htm
https://books.google.com/books?id=KsQ6AQAAIAAJ&lpg=PA123&ots=KCnvsTiFpI&pg=PP39#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-xiii
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1459&context=jcl
https://loveman.sdsu.edu/docs/1867FirstReconstructionAct.pdf
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhb&fileName=041/llhb041.db&recNum=4611
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhb&fileName=041/llhb041.db&recNum=4614
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=092/llcg092.db&recNum=237
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhb&fileName=041/llhb041.db&recNum=1555
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llrd&fileName=008/llrd008.db&recNum=407
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=016/llsl016.db&recNum=197
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/#article-1-section-8-clause-1
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter13&edition=prelim
https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhb&fileName=042/llhb042.db&recNum=1411
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/our-history/history-of-central-banking
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/nichol05/romanus-pontifex.htm
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-40-02-0356
https://www.loc.gov/resource/llsalvol.llsal_008/?sp=94&st=image
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3244614/tillman-v-walters/
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3244614/tillman-v-walters/
https://casetext.com/case/wynehamer-v-the-people/case-summaries
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/59149483add7b049345be1df
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/471/1262/1804884/
https://law.justia.com/cases/north-carolina/court-of-appeals/1989/8818sc120-1.html
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-12803-infrastructure-privatization
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1997-03-10/pdf/WCPD-1997-03-10-Pg277.pdf
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/international/international-monetary-fund
https://web.archive.org/web/20120812084938/http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.html
https://casetext.com/case/diversified-metal-products-inc-v-t-bow-company-trust
https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2660.pdf
https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2660.pdf
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title5a-node78-leaf124&num=0&edition=1999
https://www.congress.gov/102/statute/STATUTE-106/STATUTE-106-Pg1633.pdf
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/chapter-III/part-422/subpart-B/section-422.103
https://casetext.com/case/padelford-fay-co-v-mayor-ald-city-savannah
https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/international-monetary-fund
https://www.trans-lex.org/502000/_/treaty-between-the-united-states-and-great-britain-1871-/
Additional reference: (Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed.)
Boom.
This has got to be the most informing, historically sourced, and chronologically organized substack I've read. Thank you... Thoughts on binding this into a book for sale? I'd be happy to purchase
Apologies, I should have began my post with:
Thank you, thank you thank you for this post. I had seen some of this in piecemeal posts Or research I have done, but this is VERY comprehensive. OUR UNIVERSITIES NEED TO HAVE A COURSE COVERING ALL OF THIS MATERIAL. The work you put into this-which had to be hundreds of hours, is truly appreciated.
Best regards to you and yours. God Bless you. 🙏🇺🇸🙏